July 03, 2009

history of science communication

I’m at the British Society for the History of Science annual conference this week (running a session on Horrible Science and Horrible Histories tomorrow).

As ever, it’s a great conference. Today was especially exciting for me as it was full of history of science communication. This morning we had a whole session on the history of the Science Museum (after all, it was their birthday last week).

We heard all about the motivations for building Children’s Gallery in the 1930s (largely to stop kids distracting grownups), the continual issues surrounding class politics between the museum and its visitors (e.g. suggesting they bring in a fee, so as to keep the ‘hooligan element’ of schoolboys from distracting serious children). I also learnt about a 1975 Science and Islam exhibition (one of the first to charge admission, though it’s not clear why), the role played by Science Museum’s library in 1940s war effort and why the Science Museum did so badly for post-war building works compared to other national museums. Not to mention the long and complex history of relationships with Energy Industry. It's not just about BP's sponsorship of the Energy Gallery. All fascinating stuff (though I do admit I’m a bit of a Science Museum history geek).

In the afternoon, I went to a session on film. This started off with a great paper from Tim Boon (author of this book), on Julian Huxley. He showed us a clip from Huxley’s (Oscar-winning) film ‘The Private Life of the Gannets’ and told us the fascinating story of Huxley’s 1929 trip to British East Africa. This was supposedly to show African schoolchildren his film, but Boon suggested Huxley took they whole project largely as a way of promoting the role of biology education in the UK.

We then had a couple of presentations based around the film achieves at the Media Archive for Central England (MACE), aiming to convince historians of science to make more of the non-fiction film archives scattered across the country. We saw some fascinating vox-pops (of people outside a cigarette factory just after the RCP report linking smoking to cancer), and a few interview with scientists. Watching these clips and Boon's paper I couldn't help but start playing fantasy PhD thesis: a history of cancer reporting; tensions of nationalism and local cultural identity in national/ local science reporting; the role of women in science filmmaking; the increasing television-literacy of scientists; a history of scientific visualisation on screen (fantastic shot of a 3d map starting the Huxley movie, and some lovely 30s microscopy films).

These are only a snippet of the possible stories bursting to be told from these rich archives. To keep everything on a kids and science focus, I also think there’s a fantastic PhD to be written on the history of children’s science television, and Boon pointed out what a peach of a PhD topic the early history of schools-films would be. More PhDs on the history of science communication, that’s what I say.

June 08, 2009

Practising 18th Century Science, Today

A couple of weeks ago, I was lucky enough to be in the audience for Hasok Chang's inaugural lecture as Professor for the Philosophy of Science at UCL. He used this lecture in part to make points about science education, so I thought it was worth blogging some of his ideas (and my response) here.

Continue reading "Practising 18th Century Science, Today" »

June 02, 2009

Conferences

The abstracts for Brighton's Science and the Public Conference are now up (link to pdf).

Three other conferences that might be of interest:
1) Eye of the Storm: An interdisciplinary conference on scientific controversy. Run by Arts Catalyst at Tate Britain, 19 / 20 June 2009
2) Feeling Good: Health information for children and young people, Chester, UK, 23rd & 24th June 2009
3) CFP for IBBY UK/ NCRCL MA conference: Comics and Graphic Novels, to be held at Roehampton University, London 14th November (details below cut)

Continue reading "Conferences" »

May 20, 2009

Fourth Annual Science and the Public Conference

The Fourth Annual Science and the Public Conference will be held at the University of Brighton this year, on June 13 and 14 2009. The theme this year is 'Science and the public: uncertain pasts, presents and futures'.

May 05, 2009

Creationist Rock

Music video aiming to subvert evolution education via the medium of late 20th century North American Rock Music (found at The Huffington Post).

For those who don't want to set the video playing - we start with a bald and bespectacled biology teacher ranting in front of a board emblazoned with the word evolution. You can tell he's a wrong'un because he has a strained, whiny voice, dresses badly and there is an odd green light shining up at him. Not to mention the use of scary jagged closeups of his face. A pretty blonde student stares at her textbook: bored, sceptical and biting her lip. But lo and behold, there's a rockstar winking out at her from behind a diagram of the evolution of man, conspiratorially shaking his head. Then it all goes a bit Labyrinth as she sort of floats into their song. The lyrics poke fun at some of the images of evolutionary thought (monkeys), as well as the scientific faith involved. They also suggest a different take on the word evolution in terms of (Christian) personal development and the work of God:

He [the teacher] spoke with such conviction, it really made me think, maybe my teacher, he's the missing link [...] It takes a lot of faith to say we're accidents of nature, but I believe we are the work of a loving creator [...] My evolution to perfection started when God rescued me.

Eventually the aforementioned blonde and her classmates are all dancing along, the dour science teacher transformed into the smiling rockstar who points to the word 'Redefined' which is now written over 'Evolution' on the board.

The video is easy to mock, especially for those of us who tend not to question to validity of teaching evolution in schools (including me, unless I make myself question it for research purposes). However, I'm pretty sure the producers of this have their tongue quite firmly in their cheeks - at least in respects to media images (I imagine their critique of science is entirely serious). I thought it was interesting as a bit of alternative/ anti-science communication, but also because despite its very different ideological position in respects to mainstream scientific thought, aspects of its style really reminded me of Horrible Science.